Chowla's conjecture on the first Dirichlet prime: Difference between revisions

From Number
No edit summary
 
Line 29: Line 29:
===Weaker facts and conjectures===
===Weaker facts and conjectures===


* [[Stronger than::Chowla's corollary to generalized Riemann hypothesis]]: Under the [generalized Riemann hypothesis]], we have the analogous result for <math>2 + \epsilon</math> instead of <math>1 + \epsilon</math>.
* [[Stronger than::Chowla's corollary to generalized Riemann hypothesis]]: Under the [[generalized Riemann hypothesis]], we have the analogous result for <math>2 + \epsilon</math> instead of <math>1 + \epsilon</math>.
* [[Stronger than::Linnik's theorem]]: This is an unconditional version where <math>1 + \epsilon</math> is replaced by some large constant <math>L</math>. Heath-Brown have shown that <math>L \le 5.5</math>.
* [[Stronger than::Linnik's theorem]]: This is an unconditional version where <math>1 + \epsilon</math> is replaced by some large constant <math>L</math>. Heath-Brown has shown that <math>L \le 5.5</math>.

Latest revision as of 03:35, 9 February 2010

Template:Primes in arithmetic progressions conjecture

Statement

Quick statement

The first Dirichlet prime in any relatively prime congruence class modulo is .

In terms of the first Dirichlet prime

For any , there exists a constant such that the following holds:

Suppose and are relatively prime natural numbers. Then, there exists a prime such that .

In terms of the first few Dirichlet primes

For any and any natural number , there exists a constant such that the following holds:

Suppose and are relatively prime natural numbers. Then, there exist at least distinct primes such that .

This follows from the version involving the first Dirichlet prime.

Relation with other facts

Stronger conjectures

Weaker facts and conjectures