Schinzel's hypothesis H: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Related facts and conjectures== | ==Related facts and conjectures== | ||
===Weaker facts=== | |||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | {| class="sortable" border="1" | ||
Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
| [[Dirichlet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions]] || proved || We are dealing with one irreducible polynomial of degree one | | [[Dirichlet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions]] || proved || We are dealing with one irreducible polynomial of degree one | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Twin | | [[Twin prime conjecture]] || open || We are dealing with the irreducible polynomials <math>x</math> and <math>x + 2</math> | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 21:19, 29 January 2014
Statement
Suppose are all irreducible polynomials with integer coefficients and with positive leading coefficient, such that the product does not have any fixed divisors, i.e., it cannot be expressed as a proper multiple of an integer-valued polynomial. Schinzel's hypothesis H states that there are infinitely many natural numbers satisfying the condition that are all simultaneously prime.
Related facts and conjectures
Weaker facts
Fact or conjecture | Status | How it fits with Schinzel's hypothesis H |
---|---|---|
Bunyakovsky conjecture | open | We are dealing with only one irreducible polynomial of degree two or higher |
Dirichlet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions | proved | We are dealing with one irreducible polynomial of degree one |
Twin prime conjecture | open | We are dealing with the irreducible polynomials and |